I happen to have found this in Google –
furfetish.lodur.info/ - 32k
Let me just say at the outset that I think this is a pedophile I am dealing with – looking at me as a child or wanting me to join his group’s activities. I have looked into his group's messages that I think have sex undertones. Whatever it is, I think he’s wrong in getting his group interested in me. First, I’m not a weakling; I don’t allow myself to be used. Second, I am in communication. Third, as a communicator I can smell when there’s something fishy in communication systems. Fourth, I am a researcher – fresh from having looked into how terrorists use the Internet for their activities. It is said the same qualitative and quantitative techniques can be used for mapping out pedophile networks.
Hey, Charles, I have learned something about data mining and content analysis for people of your kind. For the meantime, this is what I found out about your group.
1. You use a uniform template for all your member blogs. That’s your business, but it helps me a lot in knowing who belongs to what.
2. Your texts, which you use to nest your messages, come from writing forums – foremost of which is Writing.com where you got my name.
3. You pretend to be businessmen talking about your products which names you insert in the texts you picked up from writers’ stories that you mangled in the process.
4. Your insertions of the name of your products in these texts are done manually. Because your intention is not legitimate business, even with your so-called “commodity," you intentionally misspell. One commodity I found, named Multicourt, was misspelled 25 times.
5. You are mistaken, however about ID numbers. The ID number you got with my name refers to an item I have written on “Loneliness Packaged in Poems” but it was not about me being lonely. Was that why you thought I was fair game to your shenanigans? It was mainly a critique I wrote for a poet using poetry to package his sentiments about supposed loved ones who kept a secret from him (about not living for long) but he, the persona, had found out. Then he ended his poetry with a threat – on their lives. See? It was not about me.
6. Your members are those in the Links, which you post, and you recommend to the visitor to click on the first one – because "the link says much about your commodity.” When you click on to the first link, the owner also recommends the next in line who is actually a member of your group. Each one's blog has the very same approach: a sea of words in the blogs allowing corruption, but the garbled messages are embedded therein among codes.
7. You think your readers are that low in intelligence that you don’t mind these telltale signs:
a. The unfinished statements after you insert the name of your “commodity” in every four or five words.
b. The stupid filing of the words like: cockroaches at four miss 7 sunshine bratatat Bluetooth 99 Marjorie kick my face sun in yes,
c. Appreciating your own blogs and making comments therein as though you forgot you are the supposed owner.
d. Pretending to make after-thought modifications (edit) to make the blog appear as though legitimate, but the time of modification does not appear, unlike the blog creation, which reflects time to the seconds.
Until next.
No comments:
Post a Comment